In my opinion however the decisive
De is one of them . When ask about the risk of traffic losses through slow blogging, he replies: Traffic losses can happen through slow blogging – especially with regard to the (missing) peaks through new publications. question is where we bloggers (marketers, publishers, etc.) invest the time we have gain instead. Those who throttle the frequency to invest less time and work will certainly experience a drop in traffic. However, those who invest more time in a smaller number of publications (ergo produce ‘better’ or at least more extensive content) will see an increase in the long term.
At least that’s my experience through
The frequency adjustment and the associat historical content optimization. Nevertheless, Weller sees the advantages of the development and clearly emphasizes them: I also see an advantage in the ruc Spain Phone Number List dependency on ‘social buzz’. Anyone who publishes frequently, for example in order to have something to say on social mia, is dependent on a high frequency. However, those who publish evergreen content with high long-term benefits gain a large proportion of their visitors via search (for me it’s over 30 percent) – and is therefore less dependent on unprictable Facebook algorithms or the simple existence of certain platforms.
An ambivalent matter
Other bloggers also have mix feelings about the slow blogging model. This is what Peer Wandiger from selbstaendig-im-netz.de says on the subject: I think it’s good that bloggers analyze how well things are going – and above all how much fun blogging is for them. If blogging is too stressful for you, you should definitely slow down and review your priorities in Singapore Lead general. Burnout can happen in any area, including blogging. But I can’t judge whether it’s a trend or even a promising development. I think that every blogger has to decide for themselves what is good for them and what goals they want to achieve. Blogging, when done professionally, isn’t just fun.
